An Argumentation-Based Multi-agent Temporal Planning System Built on t-DeLP

نویسندگان

  • Pere Pardo
  • Lluis Godo
چکیده

In this contribution, we study a system for argumentationbased backward planning built on t-DeLP, a temporal extension of Garcia and Simari's argumentation system known as defeasible logic programming framework (DeLP). In t-DeLP programs, temporal facts and defeasible temporal rules combine into arguments, which compare against each other to decide which of their conclusions are to prevail. We present a planning system by introducing actions (as in temporal planning) into this logical framework, and then study centralized algorithms for backward planning in scenarios involving multiple executing agents. URL http://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007/978-3-642-40643-0_20 [3] Source URL: https://www.iiia.csic.es/en/node/54492 Links [1] https://www.iiia.csic.es/en/staff/pere-pardo [2] https://www.iiia.csic.es/en/staff/llu%C3%ADs-godo [3] http://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007/978-3-642-40643-0_20

برای دانلود متن کامل این مقاله و بیش از 32 میلیون مقاله دیگر ابتدا ثبت نام کنید

ثبت نام

اگر عضو سایت هستید لطفا وارد حساب کاربری خود شوید

منابع مشابه

A temporal argumentation approach to cooperative planning using dialogues

In this paper, we study a dialogue-based approach to multi-agent collaborative plan search in the framework of t-DeLP, an extension of DeLP for defeasible temporal reasoning. In t-DeLP programs, temporal facts and defeasible temporal rules combine into arguments, which compare against each other to decide which of their conclusions are to prevail. A backward centralized planning system built on...

متن کامل

A Temporal Argumentation Approach to Cooperative Planning Using Dialogues

In this paper, we study a dialogue-based approach to multi-agent collaborative plan search in the framework of t-DeLP, an extension of DeLP for defeasible temporal reasoning. In t-DeLP programs, temporal facts and rules combine into arguments, which compare against each other to decide which of their conclusions are to prevail. By adding temporal actions for multiple agents to this argumentativ...

متن کامل

Defeasible argumentation for multi-agent planning in ambient intelligence applications

This contribution presents a practical extension of a theoretical model for multi-agent planning based upon DeLP, an argumentation-based defeasible logic. Our framework, named DeLP-MAPOP, is implemented on a platform for open multi-agent systems and has been experimentally tested, among others, in applications of ambient intelligence in the field of health-care. DeLP-MAPOP is based on a multi-a...

متن کامل

Multiagent argumentation for cooperative planning in DeLP-POP

This contribution proposes a model for argumentation-based multi-agent planning, with a focus on cooperative scenarios. It consists in a multi-agent extension of DeLP-POP, partial order planning on top of argumentation-based defeasible logic programming. In DeLP-POP, actions and arguments (combinations of rules and facts) may be used to enforce some goal, if their conditions (are known to) appl...

متن کامل

Argumentation-based Negotiation in t-DeLP-POP

In this contribution, we propose to model argumentation-based negotiation in terms of t-DeLP-POP, a partial order planning system that incorporates temporal defeasible logic. This logic combines temporal facts and durative rules into temporal arguments. We propose a dialogue protocol for the negotiation of plans in this planning system that models a variety of scenarios for argumentative negoti...

متن کامل

ذخیره در منابع من


  با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید

برای دانلود متن کامل این مقاله و بیش از 32 میلیون مقاله دیگر ابتدا ثبت نام کنید

ثبت نام

اگر عضو سایت هستید لطفا وارد حساب کاربری خود شوید

عنوان ژورنال:

دوره   شماره 

صفحات  -

تاریخ انتشار 2013